Friday, April 29, 2011

Thoughts on the passover and the lord's supper...

Hi, I'm new.

Here are some of my observations...

* the Passover is not observed by modern Jews because it is only to be observed in Jerusalem, and, I think, they believe that a priest must officiate, and it should be killed at the temple (I'm not sure of some of this, as I am not Jewish);

* instead, they celebrate with a symbolic ritual, called a Seder;

* modern Jews celebrate with a lamb and special crackers, but the scriptures called for an adult flock animal - usually a goat - and Pita bread;

* the synoptics indicate that Jesus ate the Passover with his disciples, but the fourth gospel has Jesus dying on the Preparation day;

* Jesus added to the meal the mandate to commemorate his role as "the death brought in" in the new "testament" [sic] that God was making with the houses of Israel and Judah;

* the Passover and the new "testament" [sic] is only relevant to Jews (as was the first covenant, and the "law");

* Paul said that it was better not to partake of the body and blood of Jesus than to do so unworthily. This he wrote in the context of "denominations" - which he considered the "destruction of Christ's body."

The view from here...

4 comments:

blogforthelordjesus said...

I don't mind your irreverence toward religion, but I'm always surprised when I find someone who has read the Bible and yet doesn't revere Jesus.

WoundedEgo said...

Most of my trouble with Jesus comes from the "Revelation" account. I know that the reformation guys didn't really care for that Jesus either. Maybe one day I'll just collect the parts about Jesus I like and excise those others that are so wicked and creepy.

KateGladstone said...

Re:
"Maybe one day I'll just collect the parts about Jesus I like and excise those others that are so wicked and creepy."

Thomas Jefferson did so, too -- Google "Thomas Jefferson" + "Bible" + "Jesus."

WoundedEgo said...

Thanks for pointing to that. I'm going to add a blog entry about it.

Have a great day.

Bill